amamangmang:

낙서+벌칙

milwaukeemorgan:

Diane is stealing seats. Dump her ass in the ocean

milwaukeemorgan:

Diane is stealing seats. Dump her ass in the ocean

"

Not all women are the owners of a uterus, and not all owners of a uterus are women. A transgender man—that is, a man who was assigned female at birth—may very well have a uterus, may become pregnant, and may very well need the same access to reproductive health options as your average cisgender woman. The same can be said for non-binary individuals who were assigned female at birth. As people who don’t identify as a woman or a man (though they may identify themselves as both, neither, or a combination of the two), some may feel that this language erases their identity or leaves them out. Yes, these people may have a uterus—but it’s not a “lady part.”

While there’s little doubt that women make up the largest segment of uterus-owning individuals, this name further ostracizes oft-overlooked members of society like trans men and non-binary individuals who were assigned female at birth. To exclude them in this, an organization aimed at educating the public on the issue of reproductive health, would seem to negate the organization’s stated goals by erasing identities and perpetuating the already stressful and exclusionary culture these individuals are forced to inhabit.

"

The Trouble With “Lady Parts” | Parker Marie Molloy for Slate (via gravebound)
sneakyseabear:

colossaltitan:

allofmystupids:

guynecologist:

iarrusu:

I AM SO ANGRY AT THIS

this is such an important post

“GF IS PREGO”

"glassy, jarred look"

THIS IS THE BEST ONE

sneakyseabear:

colossaltitan:

allofmystupids:

guynecologist:

iarrusu:

I AM SO ANGRY AT THIS

this is such an important post

“GF IS PREGO”

"glassy, jarred look"

THIS IS THE BEST ONE

morishiges:

aesthetic

morishiges:

aesthetic

rtrixie:

In the post you’re about to make, replace cis/white/hetero/male people with the Jews and if the result sounds like something that could be straight out of Mein Kampf, you should probably reconsider your social justice blogging habits.

memo44800:

solegunner:

reshiham:

Why cuss when you can use this  fun image of snoop dogg? image

go
image

yourself

This gif says nothing, and everything at the same time

ladyrigormortis:

asylum-art:

"Queen of kings " by Nyree Mackenzie for Moustache magazine

on Facebook

Photographer/ Creative Director: by Nyree Mackenzie Nyree Photo
Model: Gisèle Pletzer
Stylist / Fashion Director: Tamzen Holland Fashion-Stylist

ink-phoenix:

littlezombiekid:

the-uncensored-she:

Women should NOT be forced to feed their babies in a bathroom, all because we live in a misogynistic, porn-warped society that’s been brainwashed to believe that female breasts used for anything other than male pleasure is “indecent”. Support public breast feeding and end the porn culture.

Forever reblog

I find this exceptionally revolting. And I want to know if this is a US thing, because my sister breast fed my niece pretty much anywhere in Italy - including at the restaurant where we had my niece’s christening’s luncheon/celebration - and nobody ever asked her to leave, to cover herself, or even batted an eye. 

Women should not feel ashamed to feed their babies in public. That is what breasts are for. This shit needs to stop, right now.